This is what she sent me:

June 16, 2010

Dear Chris,

I am writing to you today to ask for your help in spreading the word about The Restoring Honor Rally. The Restoring Honor Rally will take place on August 28 at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. The rally is a non-political, non-partisan event that will recognize our First Amendment rights and honor the service members who fight to protect those freedoms. Glenn Beck has partnered with the non-profit organization the Special Operations Warrior Foundation (SOWF) to make this rally happen. The SOWF provides financial aid to families of special operations personnel who have been wounded or killed in battle. All net proceeds from the Restoring Honor Rally fundraising efforts will be retained by the SOWF.  

Along with Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin and Navy Seal hero Marcus Luttrell will be speaking at the rally.  Ted Nugent and Jo Dee Messina will also be performing.

I encourage you to join us at the rally and ask you to help us spread the word about this exciting event. With only a few weeks left before the Restoring Honor Rally and there is no time to waste. Please help us to promote the rally by:

• Discussing the rally at club meetings
• Posting flyers in your community. Download the official flyer at www.glennbeck.com/828
• Become a fan of the rally on Facebook (www.facebook.com/restoringhonorrally)
• Send out email blasts to your friends and loved ones

We hope that you will join us in supporting the Special Operations Warrior Foundation and the Restoring Honor Rally by spreading the word about this event. You and your members have been such an integral group in keeping America’s values and traditions paramount. We invite you to continue celebrating America by honoring our heroes, our heritage, and our future at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial on August 28.

Sincerely,

Natasha Pascetta
828 Rally Coordinator
Glenn Beck Program
 
–
Natasha Pascetta
828 Rally Coordinator
Mercury Radio Arts

Oh, they want Beck’s head on a plate so baaaaad.  Beck is the new Bush.  Beckhitler.  Beck lied, people died.  The radical ecomarxist Alinsky-inspired statist faction that is the base of today’s Democrat party is absolutely furious at Beck for outing the self-admitted communist and racist and general purpose loon Van Jones.  Outing is ok only if the target is a closet gay and Republican.  I guess Beck didn’t get the memo.

How do you defend the indefensible?  Why, you edit and cherrypick.  That’s how.  Media Matters claims that Beck bought into a very wacky-looking and wacky-sounding Acorn employee’s admission to murder without checking on the veracity of the story first.  Media Matters took some of Beck’s words out of context, edited some video, and Presto!  Proof Positive that Beck is an idiot and should be ignored.

Morrissey does a good job dismissing Media Matters’ obvious distortion of the facts, but he doesn’t go far enough.  In attempting to smear Glenn Beck, Media Matters is defending ACORN.  Media Matters is defending a criminal enterprise caught red-handed promoting child prostitution, tax fraud, and murder.

August 24, 2009 – 18:05 ET

Am I hateful if I ask:

- Our unfunded liability for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid is close to $100 trillion. Is there any way to pay for these programs without bankrupting America?

- We are in so much debt, why spend more borrowed money on cap-and-trade and healthcare programs before we stop the flow of red-ink?

- The stimulus package funneled billions of dollars to ACORN. How does giving billions of dollars to ACORN stimulate the economy?

- If it was so important for congress to pass the stimulus bill before they even had time to read it why has only a fraction of the stimulus money been spent 6 months later?

- Bush said he had to abandon free market principles in order to save them, how exactly does that work?

- Why won’t member of Congress read the bills before they vote on them?

- Why are citizens mocked and laughed at when they ask their congressman to read the bills before they vote on them?

- Was the cash-for-clunkers program meant to save the earth or the economy? Did it accomplish either?

- How did Van Jones, a self-proclaimed communist become a special advisor to the president?

- Did President Obama know of Van Jones’ radical political beliefs when he named him special advisor?

- The Apollo Alliance claimed credit for writing the stimulus bill—why was this group allowed to write any portion of this bill?

- If politicians aren’t writing the bills and aren’t reading the bills, do they have any idea what these 1000 page plus bills actually impose on the American people?

- If the ‘public option’ health care plan is so good why won’t politicians agree to have that as their plan?

- If town hall meetings are intended for the politicians to learn what’s on our mind—why do they spend so much time talking instead of listening?

- Politicians are refusing to attend town hall meetings complaining, without evidence, that they are scripted. Does that mean we shouldn’t come out and vote for you since every campaign stop, baby kiss and speech you give is scripted?

- Why would you want to overwhelm the system?

- Is using the economic crises to rush legislation through congress what Rahm Emanuel meant when he talked about not letting a crises go to waste?

- What are the czars paid? What is the budget for their staffs/offices?

2009 August 16
by David Horowitz

Glenn Beck will be on vacation this week but when he returns on the 24th he has invited me to come to New York to talk to him on camera about Saul Alinsky, the strategy guru of the Obama era. For the the Hillary-Soros generation of johnny-come-lately radicals and their ACORN footsoldiers,  Alinksy is their Sun-Tzu and his book Rules for Radicals is the field manual  for their struggle. I thought while I’m refreshing my acquaintance with this destructive fellow and re-reading his text, I would share my thoughts with you, serially over the next week.

For this first post, let’s just focus on the dedication of the book — to Satan:

“Lest we forget, an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical:” (Pause there for second. Now continue): “from all our legends, mythology, and history(and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

So Alinsky begins by telling readers what a radical is. He is not a reformer of the system but its would-be destroyer. This is something that in my experience conservatives have a very hard time understanding. Conservatives are altogether too decent, too civilized to match up adequately, at least in the initital stages of the battle, with their adversaries. They are too prone to give them the benefit of the doubt. They assume that radicals can’t really want to destroy a society that is democratic and liberal and has brought wealth and prosperity to so many. Oh yes they can. That is in fact the essence of what it means to be a radical — to be willing to destroy the values, structures and institutions that sustain the society we live in. Marx himself famously cited Alinsky’s first rebel (using another of his names — Mephistopheles): “Everything that exists deserves to perish.”

This is why ACORN activists, for example, have such contempt for the election process, why they are so willing to commit election fraud. Because just as Lucifer didn’t believe in God’s kingdom, so the radicals who run ACORN don’t believe in the democratic system. To them it is itself a fraud — an instrument of the ruling class, or as Alinsky prefers to call it, of the Haves. If the electoral system doesn’t serve all of us, but is only an instrument of the Haves, then election fraud is justified because it is a means of creating a system that serves the Have-Nots — social justice.  Until conservatives begin to understand exactly what drives radicals and how dishonest they are — dishonest in the their core — it is going to be very hard to defend the system that is under attack. For radicals the noble end — creating a new heaven on earth — justifies any means. And if one actually believed it was possible to create heaven on earth, would he not willingly destroy any system hitherto created by human beings?

The many names of Satan, by the way, are also a model for radicals who camouflage their agendas by alternatively calling themselves Communists, socialists, new leftists, liberals and most consistently progressives. My parents, who were card-carrying Communists, never referred to themselves as Communists but always as “progressives.” The Progressive Party was run by the Communist Party and split off from the Democrats in 1948 (because Harry Truman opposed Stalin), but rejoined the Democrats in the McGovern campaign of 1972 and with the ascension of Barack Obama has become the Democratic Party.

Alinsky’s tribute to Satan as the first radical, and as the model of radicals to come, should cause us to reflect on how Satan tempted Adam and Eve to destroy their paradise. If you rebel and violate the law that has been laid down for you, “You shall be as gods” the serpent told them.  You think Rahm Emmanuel was listening?

Oh, and let’s not forget this — the kingdom that the first radical “won” was hell.

Recently an email campaign has been started to get Glenn Beck off the air by targeting his advertisers. Unfortunately, these efforts have succeeded in removing five sponsors with possibly more to follow suit. It’s time we let these companies know what Glenn Beck supporters stand for and what removing their advertising means to us. This petition will be sent to all of Glenn Beck’s sponsors who have pulled their advertising. It will also be sent to current sponsors as they are continuing to be targeted.

Click here to read more and SIGN THE PETITION to support Glenn Beck.

The Opposition – What We’re Up Against

Some of the most vile, disgusting, and reprehensible Internet content comes from the political Left.  If you’re new to the Internet, fair warning: Don’t click on the link below if you have a low tolerance for filth.  This sort of thing is nothing new.  Sites like the Daily Kos and MoveOn.org are rife with it.  The Left seems positively enamored with the “F” word and low speech in general.

Not surprisingly, the Left HATES Glenn Beck with unbridled passion.  One example of many is the Wonkette blog.  If vile language offends you, do not click on this link.  The first person to resort to low language in a debate is the first to run out of ideas.  The political Left ran out of ideas many years ago, but it is instructive to take a furtive peek into their twisted world from time to time, though.